How to Defeat a Claim of Abandonment for a Never-Used Registered Mark

Illustration of part of a dictionary page defining “intention”

If you have ceased to use—or never used—your trademark in U.S. commerce, your intention to resume or commence use could defeat a claim that your registration should be cancelled for abandonment of the mark.

The U.S. Use Requirements

Before a U.S. trademark or service mark registration is issued, the applicant or its licensee generally must make use in commerce.  This is defined as “the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.”  Trademark Act Section 45, 15 U.S.C. § 1127.

There are exceptions to the use requirement.  A U.S. registration may be issued without any use of the mark if the applicant declares a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and the application is based on either

  1. a registration in the applicant’s country of origin. Trademark Act Section 44(e), 15 U.S.C. § 1126(e), or
  2. an international registration extended to the U.S. pursuant to the Madrid Protocol. Trademark Act Section 66(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1141f(a).

Further, for all U.S registrations, whether or not based on use in U.S. commerce, during the fifth and tenth years of the registration (plus a six-month grace period), you must file either a declaration of use or a declaration of excusable non-use.  Non-use caused in some way by the coronavirus pandemic possibly might qualify as excusable non-use.

The U.S. Abandonment Requirements

Most U.S. registrations are issued after use of the mark, and a registration may be cancelled if use of the mark has been abandoned.  The Trademark Act defines “abandonment” to mean that “use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use.  Intent not to resume may be inferred from circumstances.  Nonuse for three consecutive years shall be prima facie evidence of abandonment.” Trademark Act Section 45, 15 U.S.C. § 1127. 

How does this apply to a mark that was registered but never used in commerce?    The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) considers a claim of an “intent to commence use” equivalent to a claim of an “intent to resume use.”  The nonuse period is measured from the date the U.S. registration was issued until three years thereafter, or until the date the claim of abandonment is made if before the end of that three-year period, if coupled with facts about the registrant’s lack of an intention to commence use.  See our firm’s 2014 Client Alert, “Abandonment Rules Clarified for Madrid Protocol Extensions to the U.S.”  

Case Where Intent to Commence Use was Proved

In Wirecard AG v. Striatum Ventures B.V., Cancellation No. 92069781 (T.T.A.B. February 28, 2020), Striatum Ventures B.V. owned a U.S. registration, based on an international registration, of ZUPR & Design for software and software design and various services dependent on them.


Wirecard AG had applied to register SUPR for various computer goods and services, but the Striatum registration was blocking its application. 

Wirecard  petitioned to cancel that registration claiming abandonment because of nonuse for more than three years.  The parties stipulated that Striatum had never used its mark in the U.S., but Striatum argued that it had an intention to commence use as shown by activities of the type that would be undertaken by a reasonable business with a bona fide intent to use the mark in U.S. commerce.  Following issuance of the U.S. registration, Striatum had:

  • Entered into a contract for a U.S. marketing strategy;
  • Retooled its online platform in response to that marketing strategy;
  • Demonstrated the retooled products to its public relations firm; and
  • Reached agreement, at least orally, with a retailer’s representative to use the ZUPR goods and services in the U.S. following the product launch (which was forestalled because the petition to cancel was filed before the launch).

The TTAB found the timing of the cancellation proceeding to be relevant.  The launch had been announced before the petition to cancel was filed.  Further, the TTAB said that if the launch had taken place, even though outside the three-year nonuse period, it would have supported Striatum’s testimony of its intent to commence use.

The TTAB held that Striatum had successfully rebutted Wirecard’s prima facie case and dismissed the petition for cancellation.


Whether you never used, or ceased to use, your registered mark in U.S. commerce, you can defeat a claim of abandonment if you undertake reasonable and documented business practices to support your continued interest in using the mark in U.S. commerce.  These practices may include creating a written business plan and taking steps to implement it; negotiating public relations, distribution or licensing agreements; or just making a written record of the reasons holding you back from the U.S. market.

 For further information, contact Maryann Licciardi or your CLL attorney

Print PDF

Recent Posts




Back to Page